I was recently horrified when I had to
look up what a tabata was because someone on a fat loss forum told me
'it's the hardest exercise ever so I am burning 800 calories in 4
minutes'. The first link was from Shape so I clicked it. A magazine
that is supposed to be helping people lose weight and visualize
realistic fitness claimed that a single tabata (4 minutes of
exercise) provided more fitness gains than a 60 minute run. In terms
of calories, that would be about 700ish calories, perhaps more
for an obese person.
At first blush, it actually looked like
the person on the weight loss forum was right! And here I am
struggling along with P90X at 600ish calories for an entire hour!
Sound too good to be true?
That's because it obviously is and a statement like “4 minutes of Tabata can get you better fitness gains than an entire hour of running on the treadmill” is far too simplified to be a fair comparison between the two activities.
Sound too good to be true?
freeimages.com/gökçe özaslan
That's because it obviously is and a statement like “4 minutes of Tabata can get you better fitness gains than an entire hour of running on the treadmill” is far too simplified to be a fair comparison between the two activities.
According to a study put together by
the American Council on Exercise and the research team at the
University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse, a tabata actually realistically
burns 15 calories per minute. That's 60 calories for a single 4
minute tabata, a far cry from that 700 calories someone might assume based on Shape's statements.
It's also supposed to be performed in 4
rounds of 4 minutes each, not just a single tabata at 4 minutes. The
start of your exercise, when you're still warming your heart up, is
not going to burn the same calories as the middle of your exercise.
Going for the full 4 rounds is important to achieving that average of
15 calories per minute.
To make matters worse, the overweight
or obese people who read about tabata's '4 minute miracle' calorie
burn are the exact people that are not likely to actually be capable
of exercising to a high intensity level for 4 minutes straight.
Instead they will likely perform hard for a very, very short period
of time then perform to a moderate level, at best, for the rest of
it.
As someone who is trying to
lose weight, I know I am not keeping up with the fitness instructors
in the DVDs I use. I hope to one day, but right now it's important to
just keep moving. Over the course of an hour, I'll keep up with them
for part of it then keep walking or jogging in place for the rest of
it. This works, I'm still burning calories and I have a realistic
expectation of how many calories – ie. not as many as the
instructor and students in the video.
If I were doing tabata? I'd have to do
it the same way; I could not maintain that intensity. And that's not
how tabata works. Instead I get walking in place for 2 minutes and high intensity for 2 minutes. That
breaks down everything a tabata is supposed to be about. But it's
exactly how unfit fat people exercise. The 4 minute miracle turns
into an even bigger lie than it already was.
Does this mean tabata is bad?
Of course not! Tabata works for those
who have a realistic understanding of what it is, how many calories
they are actually burning and can achieve a sustained 20 minute high
intensity movement. It can even work for people who can only perform
high intensity for a tiny amount of time but keep moving at moderate
or low levels for the rest; moving for 20 minutes is still good for
overweight and obese people who don't move often, but they need to
understand they are not burning the same calories as someone who is
doing it exactly as intended.
0 comments:
Post a Comment